Foundations of Product Ownership & Agile Systems
This lesson pathway is structured in paired sessions: each primary lesson introduces a core Product Owner competency, and each “.1” lesson is a mastery studio where learners apply those skills to real or simulated products within an Aletheian, design-centered frame.
Learners are introduced to the Product Owner as a strategic, human-centered bridge between vision, team, and stakeholders.
- Define the Product Owner role within agile and enterprise contexts.
- Differentiate the Product Owner from project managers, business analysts, and scrum masters.
- Identify key responsibilities: vision, backlog ownership, stakeholder alignment, and value delivery.
- Short narrative overview: the Product Owner as “designer of value” in a digital ecosystem.
- Role comparison activity using real job descriptions (including Disney-style postings).
- Group discussion: “Where does the Product Owner create clarity?”
- Highlight verbs and outcomes in sample job postings to surface expectations.
- Map PO responsibilities to phases of a simple product lifecycle (idea → launch → iteration).
- Short written definition of the Product Owner role in the learner’s own words.
- Simple diagram of how the Product Owner interacts with engineering, design, and business stakeholders.
Learners place themselves inside a specific product context and map how they would operate as a Product Owner within that system.
- Select a product context (current job, aspiration, or case study such as a streaming app or park experience).
- Identify key stakeholders, teams, and customers for that product.
- Map where and how the Product Owner creates clarity, decisions, and value in that ecosystem.
- Peer review of role maps using prompts: “Where does this PO add the most value?” “Where might they be missing?”
- Discussion of tensions: competing priorities, limited capacity, and ambiguity.
- Clear articulation of how the Product Owner fits into a concrete product scenario.
- Evidence that the learner can anticipate collaboration points and decision moments.
- Ability to explain their PO map using both business and human-centered language.
Learners unpack the agile mindset and the mechanics of Scrum and Kanban, focusing on how Product Owners keep work flowing toward value.
- Define agile principles and how they differ from traditional project management.
- Describe Scrum roles, events, and artifacts with emphasis on Product Owner responsibilities.
- Compare Scrum and Kanban as different ways of visualizing and managing flow.
- Brief story: moving from “big project plans” to iterative value delivery.
- Walkthrough of a sample Scrum board and Kanban board.
- Interactive matching of PO responsibilities to each agile event (sprint planning, review, retro).
- Label an example board with PO touchpoints (what they own, what they influence).
- Identify risks of “absent Product Owner syndrome” in agile teams.
- Short explanation of “why agile” in plain language.
- Completed diagram showing PO responsibilities across Scrum or Kanban flow.
Learners take a small product scenario and translate it into backlog items, then visualize those on a Scrum or Kanban board.
- Given a product scenario (e.g., new feature for a streaming app), break work into items/story-level tasks.
- Place these items on an agile board and identify PO decisions at each stage (ready, in progress, review, done).
- Discuss how WIP limits or sprint goals shape which items move first.
- Peers analyze if the board reflects a realistic and sustainable flow of work.
- Group explores scenarios like blocked work, shifting priorities, and stakeholder escalations.
- Board clearly shows a sensible progression of work tied to value.
- Learner can explain how they would respond as PO to changes in scope or priority.
- Use of agile vocabulary is accurate and contextual, not just memorized.
Learners explore how a compelling product narrative becomes the north star for backlog, design, and delivery decisions.
- Define product vision and distinguish it from goals, features, and roadmaps.
- Connect vision statements to user outcomes and business outcomes.
- Use simple narrative frameworks to express “for whom, why now, and to what end.”
- Case examples of strong vs. vague product vision statements.
- Breakdown of a vision statement into user, need, and promise of value.
- Guided drafting of a first-pass product vision for a practice product.
- Annotate sample vision statements using ADTL lenses: clarity, culture, and aesthetic language.
- Draft a one-sentence product vision for a chosen domain.
- A draft vision statement that clearly centers users and outcomes.
- Ability to explain how that vision anchors prioritization decisions.
Learners iterate on drafted vision statements, test them against edge cases, and refine based on feedback and Aletheian design cues.
- Present a product vision statement for a chosen product context.
- Explain how it connects users, business goals, and broader system impact.
- Respond to stakeholder-style questions (e.g., “What happens if our target market shifts?”).
- Peers review vision statements using lenses: clarity, focus, inspiration, and feasibility.
- Groups propose small tweaks to strengthen alignment with strategy and user reality.
- Vision is concise, user-centered, and strategically anchored.
- Learner can defend and refine their vision in response to diverse perspectives.
- Language shows awareness of culture, inclusion, and long-term impact.
Learners identify users, stakeholders, and key systems, then visualize how their product fits into a broader environment.
- Differentiate end-users, internal stakeholders, partners, and regulators.
- Recognize competing needs and expectations across the ecosystem.
- Use simple mapping tools (stakeholder maps, system diagrams) to visualize complexity.
- Short case walkthrough of a product with multiple stakeholder groups.
- Demonstration of a basic stakeholder map and system boundary diagram.
- Small-group mapping of a chosen product scenario.
- List and categorize stakeholders by influence and impact.
- Draw a simple ecosystem map showing data, decision, and value flows.
- Completed ecosystem map for a chosen product.
- Written reflection on at least one tension or trade-off in the system.
Learners present ecosystem maps, then refine them based on critique, focusing on risks, dependencies, and missed voices.
- Present a stakeholder and system map for a chosen product.
- Explain where the Product Owner interfaces with each group or system.
- Identify high-risk dependencies or overlooked user groups.
- Peers identify missing voices or over-simplified relationships.
- Group proposes adjustments that increase clarity and inclusivity.
- Map reflects a nuanced, multi-perspective understanding of the product ecosystem.
- Learner can explain how system complexity will influence product decisions.
- Revisions show deeper attention to equity, access, and long-term impact.
Learners explore how to translate vision and user needs into well-formed backlog items, user stories, and acceptance criteria.
- Define product backlog, user stories, and acceptance criteria.
- Use common formats (e.g., “As a… I want… so that…”) while keeping language grounded in real users.
- Recognize qualities of good stories (clear, testable, valuable, small).
- Examples of weak vs. strong user stories.
- Mini-lecture on INVEST criteria and ADTL-informed language choices.
- Guided practice writing stories from a product scenario.
- Revise weak stories to be clearer, more user-centered, and testable.
- Draft acceptance criteria that capture what “done” looks like from the user’s perspective.
- Set of 3–5 user stories and acceptance criteria for a specific product feature.
- Brief explanation of how each story ties back to the product vision.
Learners bring draft stories, subject them to a structured critique, and refine them to better express value and clarity.
- Share a mini set of user stories and acceptance criteria.
- Explain how these stories connect to user needs and system constraints.
- Peers apply INVEST and ADTL-informed lenses (clarity, empathy, aesthetics of language).
- Group identifies where stories are too big, too vague, or misaligned with vision.
- Revised stories are clear, testable, and meaningfully tied to user value.
- Learner can articulate why revisions improve delivery and stakeholder understanding.
Learners explore basic prioritization frameworks and how to translate them into a visual roadmap anchored in vision and value.
- Describe why not all work can be done “now” and how prioritization protects value.
- Apply simple prioritization lenses (e.g., impact vs. effort, risk vs. reward).
- Draft a high-level roadmap slice aligned to product vision and constraints.
- Story: conflicting requests from stakeholders and the PO stuck in the middle.
- Overview of common prioritization models (MoSCoW, value/effort grid, etc.).
- Guided practice ranking backlog items using a chosen model.
- Sort a set of backlog items into priority tiers with brief justifications.
- Sketch a one-page roadmap showing near, mid, and far-term focus.
- Prioritized backlog list with clear reasoning.
- Simple roadmap that stakeholders could read and understand at a glance.
Learners synthesize LS 101 by presenting a small roadmap and explaining their prioritization choices to a mock stakeholder group.
- Present a mini roadmap slice (e.g., next 2–3 sprints or a quarter) for their chosen product context.
- Explain how vision, user needs, system constraints, and value influenced their decisions.
- Respond to stakeholder-style questions challenging scope, timing, or focus.
- Peers give feedback on clarity, realism, and narrative coherence of the roadmap.
- Group explores how to adapt roadmap communication for different audiences (exec, team, partners).
- Roadmap is coherent, prioritized, and clearly tied to product vision and backlog.
- Learner can articulate trade-offs they accepted or rejected.
- Communication is calm, clear, and grounded in both data and human impact (Aletheian clarity).