Studio Aletheia animated A Studio Aletheia Presents · Clarity by Design An AI Faculty Learning Series

Building Simple AI Agents and Chatbots (Use-Case Driven)

Course 05 of 08 · Workflow Design, Not Software Engineering

This multi-session lab teaches agent development as operational workflow design. Participants define a use case, map dialog flows, select an appropriate platform, then test, debug, and iterate with a focus on user experience and failure modes. The work stays grounded, ethical, and collaborative.

AudienceAdvanced faculty, staff, innovation teams
FormatMulti-session lab or bootcamp
FocusUse-case scoping, safe defaults
Course Baseline

Guiding stance: agent development as workflow design, not software engineering.

Core move: scope the use case, map the dialog flow, then test until failure modes are covered.

Success signal: a working prototype explainable to non-technical stakeholders in two minutes.

Designed for advanced faculty, staff, and innovation teams building a real institutional workflow, not custom infrastructure.

Clarity by Design Course 05 · Building Simple AI Agents and Chatbots
Core Topics

From scope to flow to iteration, with safety built in.

Defining Use Cases and Scope

Clarify user, job-to-be-done, boundaries, success criteria, and "out of scope" decisions.

Designing Dialog Flows

Map paths, intents, branching, clarifying questions, and handoff points to humans.

Selecting Platforms

Choose the right level of tooling, simple builders first, escalate only when the use case demands it.

Testing and Debugging

Build a test set, capture failure patterns, refine prompts, and reduce uncertainty with iteration loops.

User Experience and Failure Modes

Design for "I don't know," safe refusal, human handoff, and graceful recovery when users go off-script.

Collaboration and Governance

Document decisions, define owners, establish update cycles, and align with institutional guardrails.

Bootcamp Flow

A repeatable arc that produces a defendable prototype.

1
Session 1: Use-Case Selection and Scope Define success and boundaries Choose one workflow, name the user, define inputs and outputs, identify risk points, and write the "no" list, what the agent must not do. Artifacts: Use-Case Brief, Scope Fence
2
Session 2: Dialog Flow Design Map the conversation Draft intents, required questions, branching paths, and handoff rules. Build the first flow in a simple format that others can review. Artifacts: Flow Map, Handoff Triggers
3
Session 3: Platform Selection and Prototype Build Build the minimum working version Select an appropriate platform and implement the flow. Establish a prompt style, a knowledge boundary, and a consistent response format. Artifacts: Prototype v1, Response Format Spec
4
Session 4: Testing, Debugging, and Iteration Make it reliable Run a test set, capture failure patterns, refine prompts and rules, and add guardrail behaviors for uncertainty and sensitive requests. Artifacts: Test Set, Fix Log
5
Session 5: UX, Deployment Plan, and Governance Make it adoptable Improve the user experience, write a short user guide, define ownership and update cycles, and finalize a deployment plan that aligns with policy and learning goals. Artifacts: User Guide, Governance Sheet
Bootcamp rule: start simple. The first prototype must be explainable to non-technical stakeholders in two minutes.
Use-Case Labs

Pick a real workflow, then build and test it.

  • Define what the assistant can collect and what it must refuse.
  • Design clarifying questions that reduce back-and-forth.
  • Implement handoff triggers for complex or sensitive cases.
  • Test for misrouting, overconfidence, and privacy risk.
  • Define the source boundary, what documents are allowed.
  • Require citations or section references in responses.
  • Design "uncertainty language" and escalation paths.
  • Test for hallucinated policy and outdated guidance.
  • Define accepted inputs, sanitized notes or approved transcript sources.
  • Design a consistent output schema (decisions, actions, owners, due dates).
  • Add a "verify before send" checklist to every output.
  • Test for missing owners, false commitments, and tone mismatch.
  • Define allowed topics and what must be answered by a human.
  • Design responses that link to official course materials.
  • Implement "I don't know, here's where to look" behavior.
  • Test for misinformation, bias, and accessibility issues.
User Experience and Failure Modes

Make the agent safe when users go off-script.

Safe Refusal

When requests are out of scope or risky, the agent refuses clearly and offers safe alternatives.

Uncertainty Language

Responses explicitly mark uncertainty, assumptions, and what must be verified by a human.

Human Handoff

Clear triggers that route the user to the correct person, office, or process without delay.

Recovery Paths

When the user is unclear, the agent asks targeted questions and restates understanding.

UX Canon
The best agent is predictable. It should behave consistently, explain its boundaries, and fail safely.
Agent-Specific Risk
A single wrong turn in a chatbot is a wrong answer, a wrong turn in an agent with tools can chain into a wrong action. Keep tool access narrow, and require a human confirmation step before anything consequential (sending a message, logging a record, triggering a workflow).
Ethics and Collaboration

Grounded, defensible, and aligned with institutional trust.

Use-Case Boundaries

Define what the agent will never do, and publish the boundary in plain language. Always identify the agent as AI at the start of a conversation, never let it imply it is a staff member. Several states now require this disclosure by law, and students deserve to know who, or what, they are talking to.

Data Discipline

Sanitize inputs, avoid sensitive identifiers, and follow approved systems for protected data.

Shared Ownership

Assign owners, version changes, and schedule review cycles, so the bot does not drift or decay.

Baseline guarantee: the self-check below is the recap of this course, see Reflect, near the bottom of the page.
Session Reflection

Check yourself against the bootcamp arc.

A short reflection, plus the self-check this course promised at the start.

Open Reflection

One Use Case I Would Prototype

What is one workflow in your role that could become a simple, well-scoped agent, and what would its "no" list include?
Self-Check

Outcome Guarantee

Required · Close and Commit

One scope. One safeguard.

Name one use case you will scope this month, and one safe-refusal or handoff behavior you will build into it. Small and specific beats broad and vague.

Course 05 of 8 · Clarity by Design

Move to the next course, or return to the Studio.

An AI Faculty Learning Series, built for coordination across units, not just one workshop.